This page describes the supply chain we intend to build — fruit to press to fraction to pallet. It is a statement of design intent, published so that it can be held against us later. None of it is operating today.
This is the supply chain we intend to build, not one that is running. The plan is to buy from named co-operatives across the Sindhudurg and Ratnagiri belt, each registered by panchayat and contact person, and to buy only inside the natural harvest windows. No co-operative has been contracted and no fruit has been bought.
The intended standard is hand-sorting at the co-operative against a written reference sheet — moisture, visible mould, and foreign matter each capped — with rejected kernels returned rather than blended down into a lower grade. No grading programme is in operation.
We do not have a facility. The specification we are working toward is cold pressing kept well below the temperatures that damage these lipids, with no hexane and no bleaching on unrefined grades, and physical refining only — earth and steam, never solvents — on refined grades. Yield, throughput, and line count cannot honestly be stated until a pilot run has actually happened.
Dry fractionation — splitting a butter into a hard stearin and a soft olein by controlled crystallisation, with no solvents and no hydrogenation — is the core process this company is built around. It is well documented in the literature, and it is what we intend to validate at pilot scale with an established institute before committing to equipment. We have not yet run it.
The intent is that every lot ships numbered and tested, with a certificate of analysis covering fatty-acid profile, saponification and iodine values, peroxide value and microbial counts, and that a retained sample is held for each lot. Any specification published on this site is a literature value for the species.
They are listed so you know what we intend to ship with a lot when there is one.
Fatty-acid, SAP, iodine, microbial — with lot & date.
Supplier paperwork and third-party certificates forwarded on request.
Safety data sheet & allergen declaration.
The site will be open to audit once it is built.
A facility that processes peanut cannot honestly call itself a single-origin tree-butter house. This is the exclusion list we are committing to before we build one.
The intended scope is a defined set of tree-borne seed and kernel sources: kokum (Garcinia indica), mango (Mangifera indica) kernel, sal (Shorea robusta), mahua (Madhuca longifolia), dhupa (Vateria indica) seed, and imported shea (Vitellaria paradoxa) — with no other seed, nut, oilseed, grain, legume, dairy, egg, or animal-derived material processed at any time.
Published first, so that it binds us later.
Explicitly excluded — facility-wide, for the life of the plant:
Supplier onboarding (planned). The intent is that every raw-material vendor signs an allergen declaration affirming that source botanicals are not processed alongside excluded allergens, with failure to sign ending the relationship. No supplier has been onboarded.
Facility controls (planned). A restricted approved-material list at intake, and validated cleaning between runs. These are design commitments for a plant that has not been built.
Intended label statement. When there is a product, its cross-contamination statement will name exactly which botanicals share the facility.
A kilogram with a name.
From Konkan with love.